Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-16 House Journal Page 1745 SB 71 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 71(TRA) "An Act relating to funding for transportation projects; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page TRA RPT 2DP 2NR 1475 FN1: ZERO(DOT) 1476 FIN RPT HCS(FIN) 8DP 1NR 2AM 1593 FN1: ZERO(DOT) 1594 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 71(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2003-05-16 House Journal Page 1746 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 71(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the motion. There being no objection, it was so ordered. **The presence of Representative Kapsner was noted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 2, lines 6 - 9: Delete all material. Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 71(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 8 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Samuels, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson Excused: Joule, Kookesh Absent: Gara, Harris, McGuire, Ogg, Seaton, Stoltze, Williams, Wolf And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Cissna: 2003-05-16 House Journal Page 1747 Page 1, line 9: Delete "two percent" Insert "four percent" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 71(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 7 Yeas: Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Whitaker, Wilson Excused: Joule, Kookesh Absent: Berkowitz, Hawker, McGuire, Seaton, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wolf And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 2, following line 9, insert a new section to read: "* Sec. 2. AS 19.15.025 is repealed October 1, 2008." Renumber the remaining bill section. Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. 2003-05-16 House Journal Page 1748 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 71(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Joule, Kookesh Absent: Berkowitz, McGuire, Seaton, Weyhrauch, Wolf And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 71(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Objection was heard. CSSB 71(FIN) will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.